What is this about?

This blog is focused on providing information on Pay As You Drive car insurance in Australia. If you find any information, papers, news articles or websites that we should add, please let us know!

Tuesday, December 23, 2008

Leaping ahead in Netherlands, sliding backwards in Manchester


Pay As You Drive road pricing is closely related to PAYD insurance. Both are instruments that public policy makers can use to improve congestion, road usage and the costs associated with it. The concept of road pricing is charging road use on a usage base, and using the pricing to control or curb congestion. A good example of it is the inner London flat fee when you drive into London. A crude but effective way of making you think before you jump into your car and drive into London (like the traffic isn’t enough).

The problem with road pricing is that it is highly unpopular. I am always amazed that a change in toll fees for the cross-city tunnel in Sydney makes front-page news for a week (page 16 has children dying by the millions due to the Food Crisis). The voting public hates it when something they have for free suddenly has a price on it. And that is the problem. It is politically challenging for a politician to introduce sound policy in this space, particularly when people have to pay for it.

Two recent examples of success and failure are in the Netherlands and Manchester. In the Netherlands they announced a bold and spectacular program to get every car wired by 2016 and have accurate road pricing, linked to type of road, time of day and type of vehicle. PAYD insurance is so obvious once you’ve made that mind shift. Add to this the fact that the Netherlands has the highest use of bicycles in the world (having no hills has its advantages…), and you have a society where transport is going to be seriously responsible.

Contrast that with Manchester, where a public referendum said no in very certain terms to a road-pricing scheme), to the tune of 4 to 1. It is being heralded as the last rites to road-pricing (and slated as being a major step backwards for the Government (who established a multi billion dollar fund to support this) and for other cities with similar plans.
It will be interesting to understand the dynamics of how the Netherlands went about it, and what the factors were that made it successful, versus the Manchester stuff-up.

Saturday, December 6, 2008

So what’s the solution to the Multiple Prisoners’ Dilemma?

Following the post on Multiple Prisoners’ Dilemma (see 22 November post), Justin Horner wrote to me and said I cannot just state a problem without stating the solution. Fair point. I don’t have the solution, but I can suggest some solutions:

  1. From a Regulatory perspective the US is a fascinating place (in a morbid sort of way). It is legislated for example how you rate, meaning which rating factors you must use and what weights they must carry. So the easiest solution is: Mandate PAYD through regulation. Although it has been raised as a possibility in California, I think it is unlikely to happen though, and will definitely not happen here in Australia.
  2. The Government and Regulators can do a few other things too. One of these is to waive taxes and duties on PAYD premiums. In Australia for example premiums are loaded with GST, Stamp Duty and in some states a Fire Services Levy. Waive these on PAYD policies and make them even more compelling for low mileage drivers. The tax revenue argument to justify this is that low mileage drivers are over paying for road usage anyway through normal taxation methods and car registration fees. Another argument is that it will shift people into PAYD quicker, meaning less driving (see 31 July 2008 post for the Brookings Institute paper on the impact of PAYD), resulting in lower cost of infrastructure for the Government, offsetting the lower tax collections on these policies. This will stimulate the market forces through increased consumer demand, which will in turn bypass the Prisoners’ Dilemma. There are a few other government interventions. The aim is to make the cost of car ownership as variable as possible. If car ownership becomes more variable, people will drive less, which will make PAYD insurance even more attractive. There are two sides to this, described in 3 and 4 below. 
  3. Make the existing fixed existing cost variable. The prime examples of this in Australia are annual registration fees, which runs into a few hundred dollars, and compulsory third party (CTP) liability insurance, with currently regulated pricing. Clearly low mileage drivers are getting a raw deal on CTP. 
  4. Toll the roads. If I drive down to the local supermarket (or almost anywhere in Sydney, as long as I avoid the bridge and some of the motor ways) it does not cost me anything. And yet I am using something that costs money to maintain. I should be paying for it on a usage basis, as opposed to a taxation basis where my usage has no bearing on what I pay in taxes. So if there is a direct correlation between my driving and the cost of using the road, I will no doubt be more responsible. I will drive less, which will in turn make PAYD insurance even more attractive. The second aspect of this is that technology is required to do accurate tolling. This is where PAYD and tolling at least in theory can meet. All PAYD products (other than Real Insurance and Milemeter) uses a form a telemetry. That can double for tolling. It won’t be politically popular, but it will work.
  5. The Government can offer insurance companies incentives. These incentives can be targeted to ease the cost of system and product development, roll-out of telemetry for PAYD solutions requiring telemetry or even assist with promotion. The political endorsement and promotion does not cost any hard dollars, and can do a lot to stimulate the development of the product. A framework around this is suggested by Jason Bordoff and Pascal Noel of the Brookings Institute.
  6. There are also things insurance companies can do to solve their Prisoner’s Dilemma. Looking from the outside at what Progressive has done, I suspect their angle of attack is to offer a voluntary product where people get adjustment on their future premiums based on their driving in the past. This is a reasonably “soft” way of introducing it into an existing portfolio, and time will tell how successful it will be.

What will be great is to see politicians and regulators getting engaged on the topic, and stimulating the development of PAYD. Everyone is watching Steve Poizner (Commissioner of Insurance in California), who is actively developing policy for California around Pay As You Drive. Many of the US states are watching and waiting to see what happens in California before they act. Hopefully Mr Poiznier will have the courage of his convictions to do something incisive and robust. We wait with interest.

In Australia, where we have an up and running product working really well, there has been no government interest to date. We live in hope.


Sunday, November 23, 2008

A Multiple Prisoner's Dilemma

The concept of PAYD, or usage based pricing for car insurance has been around since 1920. The following is an excerpt from an email sent to me by Patrick Butler, Insurance Project Director at the National Organization for Women:

"The audited odometer mile exposure unit has been available for commercial fleets since at least the 1920s, was discussed by 1996 Nobel laureate economist William Vickrey in a 1968 paper, was the subject of a sex-discrimination lawsuit brought in 1986 by Pennsylvania National Organization for Women and documented in three Journal of Insurance Regulation (JIR) papers in 1988 and 1989, was described as the basis for an efficient pre-paid-miles personal car odometer system in a 1993 CAS Forum paper to support exposure unit legislation introduced in Pennsylvania 1990-1993, and so on.

All of these items are documented by papers and reprints available on the website www.centspermilenow.org."


So why is it taking so long for insurers to adopt Pay As You Drive. Progressive in the US had a pilot called Autograph in 1998. That is 10 years ago! Either the concept is flawed, or there must be another reason. 

In terms of the concept being flawed: The concept of PAYD will be flawed if there is no meaningful relationship between how far a person drives, or how they drive, or where they drive, and the amount of risk they bring to the risk pool. The possibility of there being no meaningful relationship is counter-intuitive, but nevertheless possible. Published results of Progressive's Autograph pilot in Texas indicates a clear relationship between distance driven and risk. Furthermore, traditional insurance pricing does its best to capture driving behaviour, by looking at factors like age, gender, vehicle modifications, etc as proxies for risk. So it is unlikely that PAYD is not taking off due the concept being flawed. There must be some other reason. I believe there are two major reasons, and a number of smaller ones. This post deals with the first reason (Prisoner's Dilemma). The second big reason I believe is systems, and will be discussed in a future post.

Multiple Prisoner's Dilemma:
The concept of Prisoner's Dilemma is a classic game theory problem. The basic prisoner's dilemma is explained quite well in Wikipedia. What does that have to do with PAYD? 

To answer this we need to look at the basic premise of the product: In traditional insurance, people who drive less, pay the same as people who drive more (all normal rating factors assumed to be the same). The reason for this is that traditional rating factors (age, gender, suburb, car make and model, claims experience, etc.) are crude proxies for the true underlying risk. Insurance companies have not used mileage actively as a rating factor, because of the difficulty of verifying mileage (mileage as a rating factor is mandated by law in California, but is not checked by insurance companies and a consumer can frankly declare whatever they want). So PAYD introduces accurate pricing for mileage, and by doing so low mileage drivers can receive a more accurate and fair premium.

If you are an existing insurance company with a large book of existing car policies, you most likely have a finely balanced book that is profitable, albeit with thin margins. Your pricing is working, and the cross-subsidies between high mileage and low mileage drivers are balanced. If you introduce PAYD you will charge low mileage drivers less (and a fairer price) and high mileage drivers more. High mileage drivers will most likely leave you and take insurance from someone else who still provides traditional insurance. As an insurance company you face the prospect of losing a large part of your book before you can replace it with low mileage drivers (where you are in fact competitive). That is a daunting prospect. You have a large infrastructure in place which you've built up painstakingly and which is well matched to your current size and volume. If you lose material volume your expense ratios will blow out, which will in turn very quickly eat through your thin margins, leaving you unprofitable. That is not an appetising scenario for any insurance executive.

So this is where the multiple prisoner's dilemma comes in. If nobody acts (i.e. nobody offers PAYD), then status quo remains, books remain finely balanced and life goes on. The first large player to offer it faces the uncertainties listed above, and may take some short term strain. After the short term strain however, the first mover(s) will start benefiting from attracting more and more low mileage drivers and having a competitive offer for arguably 50% of the market. 

What does that do to the other companies? As their low mileage drivers start abandoning them, their book becomes unbalanced. They have less low mileage drivers to cross-subsidise their high mileage drivers. Over time their margins will erode, and arguably in time they will be forced to switch to PAYD.

The Prisoner's Dilemma is not a trivial problem for existing insurers to overcome, and I think it will take many years for them to do so.

Friday, November 7, 2008

PAYD Webinar archive

On the 5th of November the National Underwriter hosted a webinar on Pay As You Drive, titled:

PAY ONLY AS YOU DRIVE INSURANCE COMING READY OR NOT

What Are the Business, Technology and Regulatory Realities You Need to Know?

It was attended by 280 people, mostly based in the US. Most of the major carriers were represented, as well as state regulators and consumer groups. The archive of the actual webinar can be found on http://www.summitwebseminars.com/exigen/Pages/default.aspx.


 

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Some coverage for Pay As You Drive in The Australian

The article below appeared in the Australian today.

Source: http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/business/story/0,28124,24546649-5001942,00.html

A car insurance product

What's new | October 29, 2008

What is it? A car insurance product which the promoters say could significantly reduce a person's premiums.

Pay As You Drive from Real Insurance allows qualified motorists to pay only for the kilometres they plan to travel.

What are its features? Pay As You Drive allows motorists to cover their vehicles based on how far they drive. Motorists can buy kilometres and are covered until they complete that distance. Anyone driving less than the average for people with the same insurance profile should pay less than they would for traditional comprehensive car insurance. Those who qualify get comprehensive car insurance with a minimum annual premium and purchase insurance for the kilometres they expect to cover in that vehicle. Unused kilometres never expire -- they can be transferred year to year or be refunded and customers who are about to run out of kilometres can apply to purchase additional kilometres. Pay As You Drive reminds customers when they may need to top up their kilometre balance with a sticker for their windscreens and SMS messages to their phones. People who have not made a claim against any of their Pay As You Drive policies for three years in a row receive 10 per cent of the total premiums paid in that time. Similar insurance products overseas require policy holders to have their vehicles equipped with monitoring devices. Pay As You Drive in Australia relies on the customer reporting the odometer reading of the vehicle insured.

What are the advantages? Pay As You Drive is suited to people who drive to and from the train station or work close to home and perhaps use their cars on weekends. It also suits those who have a second or third car.

What are its disadvantages? Pay As You Drive is not for everyone. It works for people who drive less than average. Motorists who drive a lot are actually being subsidised by traditional car insurance, so Pay As You Drive won't work for them. Pay As You Drive is available only to drivers over the age of 25.

What does it cost? Pay As You Drive claims cost savings of "up to 60 per cent on car insurance per annum". A 29-year-old Parramatta man who owns a Mitsubishi hatchback would typically pay $981 a year for insurance, but if he only drives 5000 kilometres, he would pay $316 per year with Pay As You Drive.

For more details, visit  www.payasyoudrive.com.au

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

Webinar on Pay As You Drive Insurance on 5 November 2008 2pm ET

The National Underwriter, in conjunction with Real Insurance, Exigen Insurance Solutions and Tower Group is putting on a webinar on PAYD. The details are below:

  • Date: November 5, 2008
  •  Time: 2:00 p.m. ET

http://www.summitwebseminars.com/exigen/Pages/default.aspx

Pay Only As You Drive Insurance Coming Ready or Not

What Are the Business, Technology and Regulatory Realities You Need to Know?

 
 

Are you ready for the coming auto insurance revolution?

Low mileage driver interest in pay-only-as-you-drive insurance (PAYD) is growing fast, for many reasons. It will save most drivers money on their premiums. And it is environmentally responsible - a green product that creates incentives for driving less, resulting in less pollution, oil dependence and infrastructure cost. So why are some U.S. insurers moving fast while others are slow to act?

Get answers to the important questions:

  • What is the market?
  • Is consumer privacy an issue?
  • What are the business barriers?
  • What are regulators doing?
  • What are the technology options and barriers?

Plan your company's next steps toward a fast emerging new auto insurance product

Moving to mileage-based coverage as a term of insurance has rating and pricing implications and it challenges conventional policy administration, claims, billing and other systems. Find out how Real Insurance, a division of Hollard Australia, implemented the first PAYD product not requiring a monitoring device within customers' vehicles - a solution that avoids consumer privacy issues. Hear all sides of the issue and make your plan of action.

Featured speakers:

  • Roger Grobler, CEO, Real Insurance, a division of Hollard
  • Karen Pauli, Research Director, Insurance,
    TowerGroup

  • Fazi Zand, VP, Marketing & Business Development, Exigen Insurance Solutions

 
 

Thursday, October 23, 2008

Pay As You Drive wins best general insurance product in Australia “

Real Insurance won the best general insurance product at the ABF awards for Pay As You Drive. We're very pleased about this, particularly because the product was only recently launched. It is quite an honour to win the award against all other general insurance products in a very competitive market, and I think it recognises the fact that the product is truly innovative and a great deal for consumers.

Channel 9's Extra program has also filmed a segment on Real's PAYD over the last few days. Extra is Channel 9's Queensland based lifestyle program. The segment is expected to go to air over the next few weeks.

An excerpt from the press release following the award below:

------

Pay As You Drive from Real Insurance, the first insurance product of its kind in Australia whereby qualified motorists pay only for the kilometres they travel, has won The Best General Insurance Product category at the Australian Banking and Finance Magazine Telstra Insurance awards.

Says Real Insurance CEO Roger Grobler: "Pay As You Drive gives people a fair go on their car insurance. We wanted to offer Australians a product which reflects large scale changes in their motoring habits and one which would accommodate these changing needs.

"We recognised that current car insurance is unfair to people who use their cars sparingly. The result is that Pay As You Drive offers people who drive less than the average for their age, gender and area to pay only for the kilometres they drive."

Grobler says that the way the current car insurance system is structured means that low-mileage drivers are simply subsidizing insurance costs for high-mileage drivers.

"We wanted to change that so if for example you drive to and from the train station, or work close to home, or you use your car a bit on the weekend, or you have a second or third car, it is likely that Pay As You Drive will save, in some cases quite dramatically, on your car insurance premiums," says Grobler.

The awards were mediated by a panel of leading insurance industry experts including former Suncorp Insurance boss, Diana Eilert, senior Moody's analyst, Wing Chew and top UBS analyst, Ralph Butterworth.

--------

Sunday, October 5, 2008

Smoke, Mirrors and Insurance Discounts

Insurance discounts, and in particular the 65% No Claims Discount, are used extensively by insurance companies to sell insurance. A lot of it is smoke and mirrors, because the "normal" price is not defined.

Here is a bit of a closer look:
If a seller of a product or service promises a discount of say 65%, what does that mean? Logically it means that there is a normal price, and that the receiver of the promise can pay 65% less than the normal price. So if the normal price is $100, the receiver only needs to pay $35. That is quite reasonable. It is also a good deal if the $100 was a reasonable price to start with. What if the original price (the $100) is not known? In other words, the seller promises that he is giving you a 65% discount, but there is no "normal" price? That is hardly a discount but rather a misleading sales promise right?

In the retail space (like clothes) the much used "Sale Now On" sales technique is regulated by requiring shops to have the merchandise in their stores for at least a number of weeks at the normal price, before they are legally allowed to claim a sales discount. So the merchandise had to be on the rack at $100, and for sale to the customers of the store for a period of time, before the store can discount the price to $35 and claim the 65% discount. That avoids the practice of getting merchandise in that should sell for $35, and then sell it for $35 and claiming a 65% discount.

Not so in insurance.

One of the most common practices in insurance is the "No Claims Discount", or "No Claims Bonus", where an insurance company would give you typically up to a 65% "discount" for not having had any claims for a period of time. Consumers take it quite seriously and also take pride in their NCD "status".

What happens in reality? Is there a "normal" price? Is there a $100 that was discounted to $35? Not really. Insurance has no "RRP", or Recommended Retail Price, as each insurance company takes into account a myriad of factors in calculating an individual's specific premium.

To prove the point:

  1. Take your insurance premium you are actually paying (let's say it is $700 a year). Your insurance company claims that they are giving you a 65% NCB. To do the maths, it works like this:
    "Normal" premium x ( 1 minus 65% discount ) = Premium you're actually paying
    so
    "Normal" premium x ( 1 minus 65% discount ) = $700
    to make the equation work:
    "Normal" premium needs to equal $2,000!
    Hard to believe.
  2. 90% of people are on a maximum NCD. That makes it difficult to believe that the maximum NCD is not the market price. With all the steps between a rating scale of typically 1 through to 6, it is hard to believe that the fraction of people (2%?) on a rating 6 is the "normal" price.

The advert below (large Australian insurer) has been used extensively in print, on TV and is still used online. Add up the discounts. It comes to 105%! So they're going to pay you 5% of the "normal" price if you're really good? I don't think so.

Clearly the promises are all smoke and mirrors. If you read the fine print, it says that the 20% loyalty discount is available after 15 years. And also: "For customers with a No Claim Discount or Bonus, these are applied after the Multi-Policy Discount and Years of Insurance Discount." Not sure what that means? Clearly the marketing people at this company are not very good with maths. Or maybe they are, and the rest of us isn't?

Sunday, September 21, 2008

Getting Privacy Right in Pay-As-You-Drive

Pay-As-You-Drive is a concept whose time has come. It is an amazingly obvious concept, with wide benefits for consumers, the economy and the environment. The question is, why has it not taken off? It has been contemplated (I am told) since the early 1990s), and versions of it has been in test since 2000. It is only now that it being sold as a commercial product (as opposed to a pilot or test). Why has it not taken off yet?

Probably 3 reasons:

  1. The technology has been too expensive to date for telemetry. Norwich Union as an example had to build the black box from scratch at huge expense. Technology is now very cheap and becoming cheaper.
  2. Privacy concerns. People don't like being tracked. Not yet anyway. I don't entirely buy this reason – I think it is a storm in a teacup. Think about your mobile phone. You don't think your carrier knows where you (your phone) are always?
  3. Too complicated. The first set of products was very complicated. The Norwich Union one charged differently for time of day, type of road and combinations thereof. Just too hard to understand. That plus the fact that premiums were charged in arrears, so if you go on a long holiday by road, you get a big bill from your insurer.
  4. A Prisoner's Dilemma. But more about this in another post.

This post is about privacy. It is ironic that the only academic paper (that I can find anyway) on privacy and telematics was published in Australia in 2006. It proposes a solution where the onboard black box calculates the premiums in the confines of the car, and sends anonymous aggregate driving behavior data back to the insurer for modeling purposes, whilst preserving driver privacy. So let us get back to why privacy is a concern in the first place.

Why would people be concerned about privacy, with relation to -

  1. How they drive,
  2. When they drive, and
  3. Where they drive?

The only reasons I can think of are because of wrong doings. Either you're driving too fast, breaking the law in some other way, or maybe you're adulterous. Presumably existing privacy laws will protect you from your spouse catching you with your pants down, which leaves only breaking the law. From a society perspective, we have strict road laws, with large amounts of money being spent on a police force and infrastructure such as speed cameras. Safe driving is everyone's interest.

So the privacy concern for insurance would be that the government confiscates a copy of the black box data and charges drivers for misdemeanors based on the data. Is that a bad thing? I don't think so. It is a lot better than the current system, and will result in much safer roads. So should legislation ban GPS based devices? Probably not. Ultimately consumers will vote with their wallets, and if they think they're at risk because they drive like hoons they will opt out. From an insurance company perspective, that is a good thing.

The flip side is however also an interesting conundrum. What if the insurance company knows that a driver speeds often? What if it is clear from the data that a driver is putting others' lives at risk? Does the insurance company become complicit in the crime? Does the insurance company have a moral or even legal obligation to report the driver?

Ultimately I believe that all insurance will be telemetry based (Real Insurance does not rely on telemetry, but rather on a trust-based system), and all cars will be tracked by the government for all kinds of reasons (including taxes, law enforcement and traffic control). In the mean time, while the technology matures and while privacy issues are still open, we need some runs on the board with Pay As You Drive. The article below is one of quite a large number in the US about the technology and privacy. The original source is the Insurance and Technology Blog.

Getting Privacy Right in Pay-Per-Drive

By Anthony O'Donnell
Sep 19, 2008 at 08:44 AM ET

Our recent report on Real Insurance's mileage-only pay-per-drive policy raised, once again, the question of what it will take to get drivers to use such programs. Industry observers have predicted the resurgence of telematics (the monitoring of driver behavior via telemetry) but privacy concerns continue to shape insurers' pay-per-drive strategy, as the Real Insurance example demonstrates. The Australian insurer bypasses the "Big Brother" fears associated with telematics-based pay-per-drive programs by dispensing with telemetry all together and relying instead on customer-reported mileage alone.


Progressive´s convenient MyRate device represents an improvement on more costly "black box" technology that has hampered adoption.

Progressive has struck a different balance, dispensing with location information, but keeping the telemetry. The Mayfield Village, Ohio-based insurer has also addressed cost concerns that dogged Norwich Union's use of Progressive's patented methodology and technology: getting the "black box" that registered the telemetry proved prohibitively expensive.

Through its MyRate program, Progressive supplies a small, portable device that can easily be plugged into the on-board diagnostic (OBD) port of many car models built after 1996. The device delivers a much richer portrait of driver behavior than Real Insurance's mileage-only plan by recording mileage, braking and acceleration, and time of day. The device periodically transmits that information wirelessly back to Progressive.

With MyRate, Progressive has struck a compromise: the insurer loses valuable location information that it could use for underwriting purposes, but the carrier thus reassures customers uneasy with the idea of their insurer (or anyone else privy to the recorded information) tracking their every move.

Will that be enough for Progressive's Pay As You Drive to take off this time? Though the carrier has not reported any business metrics, Progressive claims that customer adoption has been promising. MyRate is now available in seven states and one out of three eligible drivers (e.g., those whose car has an OBD port) have accepted Progressive's offer to use MyRate, the carrier says.

Monday, September 8, 2008

Pay As You Drive a solution for Motoring Hip Pocket Pain

The article below was posted on News.com.au (by Alex Tilbury). It is write-up on how to avoid the economic squeeze of owning and driving a car. The reason it appears on this blog, is because it gives Pay As You Drive as one of the solutions to this problem!

Easing hip-pocket pain for motorists

By Alex Tilbury September 08, 2008 12:00am

OH NO, the fuel light is blinking again, and it only feels like yesterday that you filled the tank for about $75, the price for an average 50-litres.

People who drive a lot have been smacked hard by soaring petrol prices and are holding out hopes of lower prices as the world crude oil price drops down to $US107/barrel.

CommSec chief equities economist Craig James said recently that he expected petrol to drop to $1.40-$1.45 a litre, from close to $1.70, saving the average family about $30 a month.

But outside forces aside, there are simple steps motorists can take to lower their fuel bill.

Supermarket savings

The  first and easiest way to ease the hip-pocket pain at the bowser is to take full advantage of petrol discounts from the major supermarkets.

Most commonly they equate to 4 a litre off the pump price at branded service stations if you have spent $30 or more on your groceries.

For a small car it may not seem like much but for a petrol guzzler that does a lot of kilometres it really adds up.

The competition watchdog has been looking into the so-called petrol price cycle and asking why petrol seems to spike dramatically over school holidays and at Christmas/Easter time.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission found the petrol cycle tends to show a sawtooth pattern, whereby prices rise rapidly over a short period and then steadily decrease, with "Cheap Tuesday'' the best day to buy during the week.

Tyre power

Keeping your car's tyres inflated to the manufacturer's recommendation will lower drag on the road and wear and tear. Your best bet is to buy an accurate tyre gauge, because the ones at service stations get knocked around.

If you don't use it, lose it

Many people use their car boot as extra storage space, and that's adding unneeded kilos to the car's weight. This reduces fuel efficiency by about 2 per cent for every 50kg.

Roof racks not in use should also be removed to lower wind resistance.

Remove heavy items such as golf clubs or even bulky prams that you don't need every day as they weigh the car down and add to fuel use.

Cool air

Avoid using airconditioning whenever possible. Airconditioning reduces fuel economy by 10 to 20 per cent when operating. Use the air ventilation system instead. However, at speeds of over 80km/h, airconditioning is better for fuel consumption than an open window.

Cheapskate

Mother of three Cath Armstrong who founded the website http://www.cheapskates.com.au only buys cars that are 12 months' old. They still have that new car smell and they are under warranty but "we are not paying full price and most of the glitches have been worked out''.

"Driving smoothly will help with your fuel consumption, so keep the revs under 2000 and you'll save petrol as the higher the revs your engine uses more fuel,'' she says.

"Avoid braking a lot and short journeys, too. Also, combine your trips, if you are doing the school run, that's when you also go to the post office or shops. Don't make lots of separate journeys.''

Comprehensive insurance 

It's a huge bill each year, upwards of $1500 for a four-wheel-drive owner.

And if you have RACQ or Suncorp comprehensive insurance, give NRMA Insurance a buzz at renewal time. The cheeky southerners reckon if they can't beat your current insurer's renewal price, they will send you $50 for wasting your time. Too easy.

Many insurers offer a slightly cheaper car insurance premium to female drivers, because claims data shows women are safer drivers.

Pay As You Drive

An ideal  solution for people who catch public transport and don't drive their car often or have a second or third car they use sparingly is http://www.payasyoudrive.com.au.

Underwritten by Real Insurance, part of the Hollard Group of companies, PAYD relies on the customer reporting the odometer reading in their car.

A 35-year-old female driver living in Corinda who drives an automatic Toyota Corolla hatch 2008 with an agreed value of $20,700 normally would pay insurance of $505. If she drove 5000km, the PAYD insurance would cost her $309, and at 10,000km the premium would be $399. A saving of $106 to $196 a year.

4WD = deep pockets

Owners of large, powerful four-wheel drives definitely pay for the privilege.

The RACQ's annual survey of private motor vehicle expenses shows big sports utility vehicles cost owners anywhere between $16,000 and $21,000 a year to own and operate.

Light cars at the other end of the motoring scale come in at the much more affordable $6600 to $8600.

The automatic LandCruiser turbo-diesel took survey honours as the most expensive vehicle to own and operate in Queensland, at $405.16 a week or whopping $21,068 a year.

By contrast the Hyundai Getz 1.4 litre manual hatchback, right, cost its owners a relatively modest $126.41 a week or $6573 annually and qualified as Queensland's cheapest car.

The motoring organisation surveyed the costs associated with 60 popular vehicles based on a five-year ownership period under average operating conditions for motorists travelling 15,000km a year.

RACQ vehicle technologies executive manager Steve Spalding says the cost of running a typical family sized car is now about $12,000 a year -- or 80 for every kilometre.

Unleaded and premium petrol have increased 29 per cent and 27 per cent respectively with diesel skyrocketing by nearly 40 per cent since 2007.

Excesses

You can sometimes save on comprehensive car insurance premiums by increasing the excess you would pay if you had to make a claim.

But NRMA Queensland state manager Brett Robinson  warns drivers need to make that decision based on their own financial circumstances.

"If you opt for a higher excess you need to ensure you're in a position to cover the cost if you make a claim,'' he says.

Hybrids

The RACQ reckons hybrid cars do not stack up too well on economic grounds due largely to their substantially higher purchase price and the consequent effects on standing cost components.

"The petrol Civic is cheaper to own and run than the hybrid variant and the petrol-driven Corolla was cheaper than its closest equivalent of Prius hybrid,'' Mr Spalding says.

"It's doubtful if consumers will flock to buy hybrids unless their pricing is more closely aligned with equivalent petrol models or there are other financial `offsets' to improve their economic attractiveness.''

Suncorp also offers an eco-friendly motor vehicle insurance discount of 10 per cent on their premium for comprehensively insured hybrids powered by a combination of electricity and one or more other fuel types, such as the Toyota Prius or Lexus 450 GHS.

NRMA Insurance offers customers a saving of up to 10 per cent on their comprehensive car insurance for driving a recognised fuel efficient car.

Drive a hard bargain

One  savvy car buyer is Lee-Ann Brighton, an internet marketing guru who wrote the ebook 'How I saved $39,856 in two years just by asking for a deal.'

She says the first thing in any negotiation to remember is "be prepared to walk away''.

"If you don't like the sales person, or don't feel comfortable with the deal, or just generally not happy with how things are going, then be prepared to walk away,'' Ms Brighton says.

"There is always someone else selling the same thing -- you need to deal with people and companies you are happy with.

"I hate dealing with fools, don't you? If a person is representing a product or service, then I expect them to know what they are talking about.''

Top 10 Tips for Fuel Economy

* Drive smoothly
* Watch your speed as higher speeds consume more fuel.
* Avoid prolonged engine idling.
* Avoid peak hour and other heavy traffic.
* Use your car's airconditioner sparingly.
* Have your car serviced regularly. Cars that run more efficiently burn less fuel.
* Keep tyres correctly inflated. Tyres that are low on air pressure have greater rolling resistance and that means your car's engine works harder, using more fuel.
* Don't carry unnecessary weight around in the car as this increases fuel use.
* Consider converting your car to LPG or buying a smaller, more fuel-efficient vehicle.
* Be sceptical about the claims made about add-on petrol-saving devices available.

Friday, September 5, 2008

Infrequent drivers pay less insurance

Source: news.com.au

INFREQUENT drivers can now insure their cars for the kilometres they plan to travel after the launch of the Pay As You Drive (PAYD) insurance policy.

PAYD is the first scheme of its kind in Australia and has been introduced by insurer Real insurance.

It is tailored for good drivers over 25 who spend less time on the road than the average person.

Real Insurance chief executive Roger Grobler says the current car insurance system discriminates against those who drive less.

He said that with high fuel costs, traffic congestion and environmental concerns forcing people off the roads, infrequent drivers should be compensated.

"Low-mileage drivers are simply subsidising insurance costs for high-mileage drivers,'' Mr Grobler said.

"We want to give these people a fair go.

"Pay As You Drive reflects large-scale changes in motoring habits and in so doing, accommodates the changing needs of motorists.''

Unused kilometres can be rolled over year to year or refunded, while new kilometres for top-ups can be purchased over the phone.

If no claim is made for three consecutive years, PAYD customers will receive a 10 per cent rebate of the total premiums paid during that time.

While similar insurance products exist overseas, they require drivers to have their cars equipped with monitoring devices.

PAYD customers report the odometer reading of the car insured.

Real Insurance esimates that significant savings can be made with its product and could be as much $923 compared with an average traditional insurance policy for a 28-year-old male from south-west Sydney driving a $23,000 Holden Astra.

Real Insurance has been operating for three and a half years in Australia and the policy is underwritten by the Hollard Insurance Company.

Related Coverage

Feeling like breaking the law? Take it “Ezy” with Laughing Out Loud insurance

Should you be able to insure yourself against breaking the law? Well you can. Just buy a L.O.L. Assist policy (and not, it is not "Laughing Out Loud" insurance…). It is Loss of License Assist insurance from Ezy Insurance. And the tag line reads "Can you afford not to insure with us?"

On the one hand it is good to see some innovation in the insurance market, but on the other hand you've got to wonder: Surely this makes a joke of the law? No wonder the press is calling it "hoon insurance". And people are not happy about it. But "any publicity is good publicity" right? LOL!


Source: news.com.au

Anger at "hoon insurance"

NEW  "insurance for hoons'' products that offer banned drivers big taxi and chauffeur-fare payouts have angered road safety campaigners.

Ezy Insure is offering a speeders' package that provides drivers who lose their licences over a series of traffic infringements $1000 a month for three months to cover the cost of alternative transport.

Penny Martin, of Working Against Culpable Driving, said the company was cushioning punishment for reckless drivers.

Ms Martin, whose son, Josh, and his friend, Jack Gilhooley, both 16, died in a car driven by a drink-driver, said: "It tells drivers it doesn't matter what they do because they won't be inconvenienced. This is the wrong message to be sending to drivers, especially younger ones.''

The RACV and traffic police described the policy as "perverse'' and "inappropriate''.

Ezy Insure states on its website it does "not condone speeding or reckless driving''.

But it adds: "If you lose your driving licence through an accumulation of points, we will assist you with the cost of alternative transport during your suspension.''

The cash could help motorists use taxis or hire a personal driver so they can continue life as usual, it says.

Cover starts from $10 a month and drivers must not receive more than three demerit points per offence.

Company director Alan Brewis said the policy was aimed at the "normal driver''.

"It's for the sort of person who is driving along and loses concentration, goes over the limit by a five or 10kmh and gets snapped,'' he said.

He would not provide figures, but said since the package was launched in January the response had "exceeded expectations'' and was "very, very popular''.

The RACV said Ezy Insure was obviously targeting a niche clientele, but it had picked the wrong market for this kind of product.

"It's hoon insurance -- this is a totally perverse offer,'' RACV public policy general manager, Brian Negus said.

He said the nature of the policy encouraged unsafe driving because motorists would feel protected against punishment.

"If you lose enough demerit points often enough to lose your licence then you have a problem,'' he said.

A police spokesman said the insurance package was a commercial matter, but it appeared to be "inappropriate''.


 

Thursday, September 4, 2008

New York Times Letter on PAYD response to less driving

The following is a letter from Jason Bordoff and Pascal Noel to the New York Times, and posted in their "Opinions Section".

There is not really anything new that has not been posted on this blog before, but the letter is eloquent and states a clear answer to the question of what happens if people drive less. The point being that current insurance pricing does not adjust efficiently for it, and insurance companies will make abnormal profits in the short to medium term in response to less driving. So Pay As You Drive is a much better consumer proposition in response to less driving.

Source: New York Times

Lower Premiums

"Hit Up for High Premiums" (Business Day, Aug. 23) reports that auto insurance premiums are rising even though Americans are responding to higher gas prices by driving less, which means fewer accidents and thus fewer insurance claims.

If auto insurance premiums were priced per mile driven rather than as a lump sum per year, drivers would automatically see insurance costs decline when they drive less and would not have to rely on insurance companies to respond to reduced driving with lower premiums.

According to our most recent research, such pay-as-you-drive auto insurance pricing would save two-thirds of households money on auto insurance, with an average savings for those households of $270 per car.

The system would also give drivers incentives to drive less, which would mean reduced accidents, congestion, carbon emission, oil dependence and pollution — benefits we estimate to be between $50 billion and $60 billion per year.

Jason Bordoff
Pascal Noel
Washington, Aug. 27, 2008

Published 2 September 2008.

Tuesday, September 2, 2008

Why Norwich Union pressed pause, and the problem with Telematics

The section below is from a blog called "Grush Hour". It contains a transcript from an interview with Norwich Union's Erik Nelson. The interview itself is a worthwhile read, and gives insight into why they pressed "pause" on their version of Pay As You Drive. The key reasons are the cost of the GPS box. I think they also made a mistake in designing an over-complex product. But the thinking is well explained. It is also interesting to see how high their retention rate was.

From the Grush Hour:

It's old news by now that Norwich Union has withdrawn from the fledgling PAYD insurance market. Many were taken by surprise. Listening to spokesperson Erik Nelson explain why provides that perfect 20-20 hindsight for the rest of us. He also provides a fabulous insight into the value of this program. He still clings to one critical, false hope however. But let's hear from Erik first. He is interviewed here by someone from Traffic Technology International, and transcribed below for your convenience.

TT: Norwich Union's innovative telematics-based pay-as-you-drive insurance policy was withdrawn earlier this year because it was costing too much to operate, but as spokesman Erik Nelson reveals, the company plans to re-enter the market once economic conditions prove more favorable.

EN: What we did was we installed a box in their vehicles, a GPS-based box and that box tracks their movements, it tracks a couple of things actually. It tracks how far they were traveling, it tracks the time of day and it tracks where they were traveling - that is what type of road specifically they were on. The reason we are interested in a road – what type of road - is because we know for example that motorways are ten times safer than urban roads so we're able to give you better rate on motorways than driving on an urban road which is more dangerous. We also know for example that driving at night, especially for young drivers is much more dangerous than it is traveling during the daytime, so we take in the time of day, we take in the road that you're using and we're able to give you an individualized pence-per mile tariff. Now based on that, [and] the number of miles you drive, you get your premium.

TT: Did you find that people actually did change their driving habits as a result of this policy?

EN: That's a very interesting question. I think that's very difficult to answer, because of course we didn't know what they were driving like beforehand. What we did see was that people were driving over the time gradually a little bit less, I think they were very conscious of how far they were driving. The big thing is not about how far they were driving, though. It's about the times of day and they types of roads they were using. We definitely saw safer driving behavior. As a result our claims reduced by more than 30% which is a staggering statistic and a huge boon for road safety. But when you are able to incentivize, for example, young drivers not driving during the most dangerous times of day for them, when they are 10 times more likely to be involved in an accident at night, 14 times more likely to be involved in an accident at night on the weekend. And you incentivize them to take the taxi, take public transport or whatever when they go out during those times you see accidents drop more than a third, you're really on to something in terms of roads safety.

TT: I understand that renewals were really quite high on this, the policy seemed to be popular, yet you didn't carry it on from the Spring of this year.

EN: That's correct. The retention rate was at or above 90% during the time that we operated the policy, and feedback from customers was overwhelmingly positive. This is probably because customers were saving around 30% on their premiums. So we paused it because, simply put, because the economics of the policy don't work out for us right now. We thought that telematics was going to be a lot further along than it actually is. We thought that motor manufacturers would be installing telematics devices in the vehicles that they are making at the point of manufacture, but that did not come to be, and certainly not on the scale that we imagined. So instead of piggy-backing our little insurance policy on the back on existing piece of kit in a car, we were actually forced to provide the kit and install the kit ourselves which from an operating model point of view becomes very expensive and that is why we have temporarily withdrawn.

TT: Is it the case that the motoring industry just isn't ready for this yet?

EN: I don't know if it is the case of whether the motoring industry is ready for it. You'd have to speak with the motor manufacturers about that. Certainly it's the case from our perspective I think we were just a little bit ahead of our time. I think we as a company still have faith that the telematics industry will continue to evolve and at some point the time will be right for us to re-enter the market because their will be more telematics devices in vehicles and it will be much more sustainable for us to operate a policy such a pay-as-you-drive and we look forward to re-enter the market in a very good position at that time.

TT: Do you foresee that technology like that is very much going to be a key part of insurance policies in the future, like red-light boxes that stop cars maybe from driving over red lights, that sort of technology's going to be key?

EN: There are so many different ways that this technology can be used. As an insurer, our main objective is to find a way to calculate a premium. I think that is what pay-as-you-drive did incredibly cleverly and incredibly well and that is calculate a usage-based premium that motorists found fair and transparent in a way that has never been done before.

TT: Erik Nelson from Norwich Union. If you have any questions about this feature contact tt@ukintpress.com.

~~~


The false hope Erik Nelson clings to is that the automotive manufacturers will soon pre-install the telematics he needs. While this is technically possible, it is unlikely – mostly because we do not yet know everything about how we want these telematics to behave. To do insurance-only is an unworkable model – as Erik can attest. We'll need a whole fleet of cross-subsidizing services to make the pre-installation calculus work out. A package like OnStar causes the purchaser some pause before adding it to the invoice. We will soon be paying for road use via GPS, which itself remains unreliable for most telematics manufacturers in built-up cities. And why not handle parking while we're at it?

The assumption that we will record GPS tracks and process them off-board will hit a privacy wall. The counter assumption that we will pay everything on-board raises equal security concerns. The ISO standards to guide all this were completely scrapped a couple of years ago after nearly a decade of work. Only some components of the new edition, which I estimate to be about ¾ complete, will survive a hard privacy review in the EU and the US. What little the privacy advocates leave intact of the new standard will scare off most of the automotive manufacturers.

I believe all this will serve to delay the time when the automotive manufacturers will provide a "whole product" that an insurer could simply "piggy-back" on. The telematics market segment that will handle financial transactions (insurance, road-use, parking), must be "liability critical" – in other words, it must be critically reliable and repeatable – something
we call "financial grade" GPS. The technology to do this is not the same as navigation grade GPS and the automotive manufacturers know this.

This, and the fact that there is already a world fleet of well over 500,000 vehicles that will need an aftermarket fitting, informs my prediction that the early years of PAYD will based on self-installed, specialized, "financial-grade" systems that also provide a couple of other payment services such as road and parking tolls.

Sunday, August 31, 2008

Governator Schwartzenegger: “Enough power saved for 8 x LA”

"Governator" Arnold Schwartzenegger is supporting a website called www.ecodrivingusa.com. Its premise is that with a number of good habits, anyone can reduce their fuel usage by being more efficient. It is compelling stuff. He says that if all Americans follow the practices explained on the website, they can save 15% on fuel. That is enough to power 8 cities the size of Los Angeles. Add PAYD on that, and it is another 4 LA's.

What follows below are their tips on how to be a better, more efficient driver:

Believe You Can Reduce Fuel Use and Emissions

Many of the best practices for green driving are subtle, but they can add up over a year. Making small changes in your driving can be the most effective way to reduce fuel use and carbon dioxide emissions, and the best part is you can do it today, with whatever vehicle you are currently driving. What you monitor, you manage...so start adapting a "lead foot" to a "feather foot" and keep track of the savings over several tanks of gas. Typically, practicing moderate levels of EcoDriving can reduce fuel use by an average of 15%.

Avoid Rapid Starts and Stops

Rapid starts and stops, often called "jack rabbit" starts and stops, use fuel and costs money at the gas pump. Gentle acceleration and braking can save more than $1 per gallon, according to the U.S. EPA, because smart driving can improve fuel economy by up to 33%. A few seconds of high-powered driving can use as much gas as driving for several minutes at more measured speeds. Ease into accelerations and brake smoothly, especially around corners, to raise your mileage the most. Avoid tailgating. When EcoDrivers™ avoid rapid starts and stops, they are not only practicing safe driving habits, but they're also reducing the energy required to get the vehicle moving again.

Keep on Rolling in Traffic

Slow-and-go always is better than stop-and-go, and not just to reduce traffic congestion woes. Maintaining a constant speed in your commute increases fuel economy, because it takes much more energy to move a stopped vehicle than to keep a vehicle moving. In fact, it can take 20 percent more fuel to accelerate from a full stop than from 5 miles per hour. Many truckers practice this approach to reduce shifting ten-speed truck transmissions. Drivers who try to achieve the highest mileage possible, often called "hypermilers", practice looking ahead down the road to anticipate stops and to coast as much as possible.

Ride the "Green Wave"

Traffic lights are often synchronized so that a motorist driving at a specific speed will pass through a series of green lights without stopping. Driving more quickly means you arrive sooner at a light and need to stop. Engineers optimize the traffic light timing to reduce congestion and improve traffic slowly. A steady speed often can help drivers avoid red lights, therefore keeping the car moving more efficiently.

Use Air Conditioning at Higher Speeds

Air conditioning can reduce mileage significantly, by as much as 20%. In fact, your air conditioner can consume up to one gallon of gas per tank to cool the vehicle. But driving with your windows open can produce aerodynamic drag, which reduces fuel economy. What's a driver to do? When driving at slower speeds (less than 40 mph), such as driving in urban areas, open windows are better. At higher speeds (over 40 mph), open windows use more fuel than the air conditioner, so close the windows and turn on the air conditioner. Another good idea is to take advantage of the "recycle inside air" feature. The air that is already cooled in the car is reused by the air conditioning system, instead of drawing hot air from the outside to be cooled.

Maintain an Optimum Highway Speed for Good Mileage

Highway driving that exceeds 60 miles per hour uses more fuel. According to the U.S. EPA, every 5 miles over the 60 mph level is equivalent to paying 20 extra cents per gallon for gas. Observing the speed limit and not exceeding 60 mph (where legally allowed) can improve mileage by 7-23%.

Use Cruise Control

During highway driving, cruise control helps maintain a steady speed. According to a test conducted by Edmunds.com, cruise control can provide a 7% average fuel savings, compared to driving without the device operating. These benefits come largely from driving on flat terrains, according to Edmunds. Cruise control maintains a constant vehicle speed. If you are driving on hilly roads, cruise control may cause your engine to speed up on climbing hills and slow down on the other side, reducing mileage, so use cruise control selectively. Using cruise control on 10,000 of the miles driven in a year could save you nearly $200 and save more than 60 gallons of fuel, according to the Department of Transportation (assuming $3 a gallon for fuel, 20 MPG, and 15,000 miles driven annually).

Navigate to Reduce Carbon Dioxide

Planning driving trips, even Saturday shopping, can help reduce fuel use and CO2 emissions. One of the easiest ways to plan trips is to purchase a navigation system to find the shortest distance to your destination. And, it can make the Saturday shopping trip more relaxing, too.

Avoid Idling

Idling uses gas, but because the car is going nowhere, it translates into 0 mpg. An automobile may burn more than half a gallon of fuel for every hour spent idling, so turn your engine off for long stops. How long is long? As a rule, shutting off your engine for any stop anticipated to be longer than 30-60 seconds saves gas and reduces carbon dioxide emissions. But make safety your highest priority, and only shut off your engine in situations where you are not in traffic, such as waiting to pick up the kids or when you're making a quick drop off or pick up.

Buy an Automated Pass for Toll Roads

Computers make our lives easier in many ways, including reducing fuel use. By purchasing an "E-Z" pass for a toll road or bridge, a driver avoids stopping and starting the vehicle and idling in lines. Special lanes allow drivers to maintain a cruising speed through the toll. This saves time and money at the pump.

Use the Highest Gear Possible

Automobiles are designed to start in the lowest gear possible, because that's where they have the most power, however, power means fuel consumption, according to Edmunds.com. By using overdrive gearing where possible, such as on the highway, your vehicle's engine speed goes down, saving fuel and engine wear while reducing CO2 emissions.

Drive Your Vehicle to Warm It Up

Today's automobile does not need a warm-up period before driving it. Even on the coldest morning, running your engine for 30 seconds is all you need before your vehicle is ready to drive, according to J.D. Power. This is enough time for the oil to circulate throughout the engine. Your vehicle will reach its optimum operating temperature much faster when you are driving, rather than idling. Today's engines are designed to run most efficiently when warmed up, so you want to warm up the vehicle by driving it. During the first few minutes of driving when an engine is cold, try to avoid sudden or severe acceleration. Also, you don't need to step on the gas pedal before starting the engine. Take advantage of a warm engine by "trip chaining", or grouping your trips together. For more information, visit www.DriveLessSaveMore.com.

Keep Your Cool

The inside of a vehicle heats up quickly in summer sun, reaching 120 - 130 degrees Fahrenheit in just 10 minutes. That can mean more air conditioning use, and that means more fuel use. Now, keeping your cool reduces carbon dioxide emissions too. So, always roll down the windows when getting into a hot car to blow out the hot air. Try to park in the shade. And consider investing in a heat reflector or window shades to shield your vehicle's interior from the sun. Parking in your garage instead of outdoors can help keep your vehicle cooler in the summer.

Obey your Check Engine Light

Today's automobiles have sophisticated onboard diagnostics (OBD) systems that continually monitor the operation of your vehicle. When the OBD alert light comes on, there is the possibility that your emissions are increased and your fuel economy is going down. An example would be if the oxygen sensor has failed and the engine controller goes to a default setting - increasing fuel consumption. Replacing a faulty oxygen sensor could result in a fuel economy improvement of as much as 40%. When the OBD light goes on, see your auto dealer for more information.

Friday, August 29, 2008

Pay As You Drive impact equivalent to taking 10 million cars off the road in California

A press release by the Californian Department of Insurance states that if 30% of Californian drivers participate in Pay As You Drive insurance, California could avoid:

  • 55 million tons of CO2 between 2009 and 2020.
  • That is the equivalent of taking 10 million cars off the road!
  • It would save 208 billion liters of petrol.
  • It would save Californians US$40 billion in car-related expenses.

Given that Pay As You Drive theoretically charges people who drive less than average, less for insurance, it would appeal to 50% of the market. The 30% participation figure is therefore quite plausible.

The numbers are quite staggering.

Full press release below. Source: http://www.insurance.ca.gov/0400-news/0100-press-releases/0070-2008/release089-08.cfm

SACRAMENTO - Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner today announced that he is making a new, green auto insurance option available for California consumers. Pay-as-you-drive auto insurance is a way for motorists to more accurately pay for the coverage they need, by linking their premium more closely with the number of miles they drive. Any incentive like this to get people to drive fewer miles will help reduce greenhouse gases and vehicle accidents.

"I am thrilled to pave the way for California drivers to obtain insurance that is more environmentally friendly and more accurately reflects driving habits," said Commissioner Poizner. "As a strong advocate of healthy market competition and a healthy environment, I am especially pleased to encourage this kind of innovation and additional options for consumers."

The Environmental Defense Fund estimates that if 30% of Californians participate in this voluntary coverage, California could avoid 55 million tons of CO2 between 2009 and 2020, which is the equivalent of taking 10 million cars off the road. This would save 5.5 billion gallons of gasoline and save Californians $40 billion dollars in car-related expenses.  Additionally, the California Air Resources Board has recommended the adoption of pay as you drive as one of the means to meet future climate change gas reduction targets.

Current auto insurance regulations require that rates are based on estimated annual mileage. The new regulations will provide an additional option for actual mileage, or pay-as-you-drive coverage. Commissioner Poizner's newly-proposed regulations will let insurers offer a voluntary option for consumers who are interested in pay-as-you-drive coverage. 

Under the new regulations, consumers could verify mileage by odometer readings, automotive repair records, or a technological device used to collect mileage data. Commissioner Poizner's regulations explicitly prohibit insurance companies from requiring policyholders to participate in a pay-as-you-drive program. A copy of the regulations is available below. 

As a former Silicon Valley entrepreneur who founded SnapTrak, a company that pioneered technology to put GPS receivers into cell phones, Poizner understands firsthand that GPS can be a life-saving tool when used appropriately.  However, Poizner has also said this type of technology does not have a place in pay-as-you-drive auto insurance for privacy and public policy reasons. 

"California has always been at the forefront of technological innovation. A major priority for the Department of Insurance is harnessing this technology to benefit consumers," continued Commissioner Poizner. "At the same time, it is vital that the privacy of drivers remains intact. I will not approve any auto insurance policy that aims to utilize GPS devices in order to obtain location data from consumers."  

California law has procedures in place to allow for public involvement in adopting new regulations. After these procedures are completed, the regulations will take effect - not later than fall 2009. Insurers will then be able to apply to offer this product in California. 

Commissioner Poizner has and will continue to pursue policies that benefit the environment. Currently, Poizner is sponsoring SB 1279 (Sen. Maldonado), which will allow insurance companies to submit paperless filings to the Department of Insurance, significantly reducing the amount of trees cut down by the numerous paper filings the Department receives annually. Last month, Poizner approved the first green homeowners insurance policy in California. 

Click here for proposed regulation.


 

US car crash fatalities drop by 20% following a 2.7% drop in driving

The abstract below is from a research paper with a fascinating result. The US experienced a 20% drop in fatalities caused by car crashes, following a 2.7% drop in mileage driven. The hypothesis of the author (Michael Slivak, University of Michigan) is that the drop in mileage driven is due to fuel prices, but that it is disproportionately skewed to low income drivers, who are also high risk drivers. Combined with that is safer driving as a result of more economic driving. The benefits of a 20% drop in fatalities are huge, both in cost and economics.

Another paper by the Brookings Institute (see posting of 31 July 2008) estimates that Pay As You Drive has the potential to reduce driving by 8%. Clearly the result of Michael Slivak's paper cannot be extrapolated linearly, but it would indicate a drop in fatalities of much greater than 8%.

Abstract of Michael Slivak's paper: Trends in U.S. motor vehicle fatalities, gasoline sales, and distance driven were examined for 12 months from May 2007 through April 2008. The results show substantial year-toyear reductions in motor vehicle fatalities during this time period that cannot be fully explained by the reductions in gasoline sales and distance driven. This is especially the case for the latest two months examined (March and April 2008). Here, the reductions in motor vehicle fatalities averaged 20%, while the reductions in gasoline sales and distance driven were in low single-digits. Consequently, it appears that a major shift in driver behavior might be occurring. This shift may involve disproportionate reductions in distance driven for more risky driving conditions and for drivers with less income (who tend to have higher crash rates), as well as possible reductions in speeds as a means of increasing fuel economy. Should the March and April 2008 trends continue, the 2008 annual fatalities would drop to under 40,000 for the first time since 1961.

Full paper.

Thursday, August 28, 2008

California State Insurance Commissioner backs Pay As You Drive

Excerpt: "I am thrilled to pave the way for California drivers to obtain insurance that is more environmentally friendly and more accurately reflects driving habits," Poizner said at a Sacramento news conference. "As a strong advocate of healthy market competition and a healthy environment, I am especially pleased to encourage this kind of innovation and additional options for consumers."

Source: Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-insure28-2008aug28,1,5163500.story

SACRAMENTO -- "Pay-as-you-drive" auto insurance -- with premiums tied to the exact number of miles driven each year -- may be just around the corner for California motorists, state Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said today.

The commissioner released proposed state regulations that would give motorists the option of using the new rates as soon as next year, and several major insurers said they are interested in offering such plans.

Such policies, available on a limited basis in more than 30 other states, have two purposes: They would give insurance companies a more accurate way to set premiums, and they would offer motorists a financial incentive to drive less.

Currently, rates are based partially on drivers' often erroneous estimates of how much they drive as well as their safety records and number of years behind the wheel.

Under Poizner's proposed regulations, drivers could report their annual mileage in three ways: They could have their vehicle odometer checked by an insurance company representative; they could submit vehicle maintenance records; or they could have an electronic device installed in their cars that would transmit information to insurers.

The proposal is supported by the insurance industry, environmentalists and consumer groups. Environmentalists consider pay-as-you-drive policies an important tool for helping California curb emissions of the greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.

"I am thrilled to pave the way for California drivers to obtain insurance that is more environmentally friendly and more accurately reflects driving habits," Poizner said at a Sacramento news conference. "As a strong advocate of healthy market competition and a healthy environment, I am especially pleased to encourage this kind of innovation and additional options for consumers."

The Environmental Defense Fund, which backs Poizner's proposed regulations as well as a similar effort in the Legislature, estimates that California drivers would save $40 billion in car-related expenses between 2009 and 2020 if about one-third of them switch to pay-as-you-drive policies.

Environmental Degradation – PAYD contributes to less car pollution

Excerpt: " You might have a question in mind like, "Why am I paying high premiums if I'm not using my car often"? With the pay as you drive insurance premiums, you would be able to quite literally pay as you go."

Source: http://www.insurancearticle.org/pay-as-you-drive-1031/

Nature is one of God's creations. It is one of His best works of arts. But nowadays, the degradation of the environment seems to be unabated. One of the things, which contribute to the gradual destruction of the environment, is air pollution. Studies show that one of the great contributors to this is the smoke coming from the vehicles. Because of this fact, new concept in car insurance is formed - the pay as you drive auto insurance.

The idea behind pay as you drive auto insurance is simple - if you do not drive much, you will pay high insurance premiums. Advocated for this type of insurance policy thinks that there are many merits to this type of program such as the gas consumption, lower costs to the consumer and less air pollution.

You might have a question in mind like, "Why am I paying high premiums if I'm not using my car often"? With the pay as you drive insurance premiums, you would be able to quite literally pay as you go.

Essentially the insurance company will set an average driving amount for each car type. It could be broken down into a cents par mile basis. You would purchase a set of number of miles if you wanted to use the pay as you drive auto insurance system. You would be covered for insurance during this period. For those individuals who do not use their car most often or try to find cost saving methods or environment saving alternative, this pay as you drive system is an excellent idea. Though this type of program is not yet available, there are supporters in many states who are hoping to have this soon.

Environmental Defense, the conservation Law Foundation and even the US environment Protection Agency are some of the groups that are working to organize a national cooperative that would work with insurance companies to offer deep discounts for low-mileage drivers. This is halfway a step towards PAYD (pay as you drive) insurance.

General Motors and On-Star offers PAYD rates. GMAC or General Motor Acceptance Corporation Insurance began offering mileage-based discounts to Onstar subscribers located in some states, in the middle of 2004. To verify mileage, the Onstar system reports a vehicle's odometer readings at the beginning and end of the policy term. Motorists who drive less than the specified annual mileage car receive insurance premium discounts of up to 40%. PAYD program are now available in Israel, South Africa and Holland.

Like in the cell phone plan that you can pay as you talk. The pay as you drive auto insurance is also a good idea. From this little thing, you can also contribute to the renewal of the beauty of nature.

Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Monday, August 18, 2008

Privacy Concerns with Telematic PAYD solved by Real’s PAYD

Real Insurance's PAYD product does not depend on telematics. It solves the problems created by telematics, as discussed in the article below:

Excerpt:

California regulators recently passed Pay As You Drive insurance legislation that would allow insurance companies to place tracking devices in cars and calculate rates according to actual mileage driven. Not surprisingly, privacy advocates are deeply concerned about the implications of the new technology.

"Where I drive, when I get there and whether I stop on the way is not the business of my insurance company or any other corporation who wants to place eyes in my car," says Carmen Balber of the group Consumer Watchdog.

Source: http://www.freshnews.in/new-location-technologies-worry-privacy-advocates-2-52109

New location technologies worry privacy advocates

Millions of people around the planet now carry personal tracking devices with them every day. Their mobile phones broadcast their location all the time. Tech firms and marketers see it as a huge opportunity, but privacy advocates are squirming at the implications.

The worries grew this week.

Web giant Yahoo has unveiled an application called Fire Eagle that allows users to easily share their location via their mobile phone with friends, Internet programmes, their home automation system or anything else that's connected to the world's vast digital net.

Yahoo has made the programme freely available to any developer who wishes to use it. A tour-book company could sell online tours that self-narrate over the phone as users move from landmark to landmark on a visit to London.

"For years, we have been talking about location-based services as the next frontier of the Internet," says Internet development consultant Tim McCullen. "Fire Eagle is a huge step in making that happen."

Yahoo didn't invent location-based services. GPS navigation devices already offer drivers numerous options. But the feeling is that with devices like the iPhone spreading the mobile Internet, the sector is about to take off.

Already 50 programmes are incorporating the service into their applications.

A start-up called Loopt allows you automatically broadcast your location to selected recipients on a real-time basis. Blogging platform SixApart allows users to automatically geo-tag their locations, and the Doppler social network allows frequent travellers to share their locations.

Of course, there are more obvious uses for LBS programmes such as finding the nearest business or service, such as an automated-teller machine or restaurant, navigation aids, and the tracking of people, vehicles or traffic.

But the major beneficiaries could be advertisers, who are drooling at the prospect of sending promotions to mobile users based on their locations - alerting them to special discounts at nearby stores, for example.

The use of location-based services is moving beyond the Internet.

California regulators recently passed Pay As You Drive insurance legislation that would allow insurance companies to place tracking devices in cars and calculate rates according to actual mileage driven.

Not surprisingly, privacy advocates are deeply concerned about the implications of the new technology.

"Where I drive, when I get there and whether I stop on the way is not the business of my insurance company or any other corporation who wants to place eyes in my car," says Carmen Balber of the group Consumer Watchdog.

Yahoo counters privacy concerns by noting that Fire Eagle differentiates itself from other services by the ease with which it allows users to control what information is released about them and to whom.

But that's of little comfort to privacy advocates who note that most people do not delve down into software programmes to customise features.

"For individuals who do not want their location to be known, these services could be harmful," said Beth Givens, director of the Privacy Rights Clearinghouse.

Critics wonder if users will realise that copies of their data will be stored by virtually every application that connects into Fire Eagle as well, making it extremely difficult for anyone to completely erase their tracks.

Telecom expert James Middleton wonders whether the attraction of location-based services may be overhyped, pointing out that people who go to a restaurant generally won't wait until they are standing on an unfamiliar street corner to decide where to eat.

"The industry has been wandering around in circles looking for killer services and applications that might not exist," he said. "As the joke goes, a really useful LBS application would be one that could point you to a really useful LBS application."